Talk:1890 New Zealand general election

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Party strength

edit

With this edit, the party strength table was changed back in 2011, with "two from Other to Liberal - Maori results were 2 Liberal, 2 Independent" as edit summary. The whole affair is unreferenced, but I see that the original info comes from Wilson (1985). Party strengths are recorded in a table on pages 287f, and the votes and percentages are in a table on pages 289f. So, I could add references to the original version of the table, but the 2011 edit has changed party affiliation, and that means that the votes no longer correspond to the number of politicians. Can I thus suggest that:

  • We restore the data as they were originally.
  • I will then provide proper referencing.
  • We record the 2011 edit summary as a footnote to the table.

Any thoughts? Schwede66 17:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Zealand general election, 1890. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply