Talk:1916 Irondale earthquake

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1916 Irondale earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC) This is a good article overall. I found the following concerns though:

• "Like other earthquakes in Alabama, it caused only moderate damage, but the damage was extensive." So was the damage moderate or extensive? Or both? If the latter it's written a bit redundantly.
• "Today, an earthquake similar in size to the 1916 Irondale event could hypothetically damage thousands of buildings, costing up to $1 billion." Is there a dollar figure for how much damage was caused? It can also be adjusted for inflation.
• "Striking just after 4 P.M. local time," linking local time to Eastern Time might be beneficial.
• "but from earthquakes in the NMSZ and other fault zones." When you mention the NMSZ earlier in the article, I would add the abbreviation to make it easier to follow.
• "If there is an earthquake in one of the zone areas, North Alabama is certainly going to feel it. There's going to be damage and some perhaps major. If one occurred in the zone close to Memphis, it would be devastating because buildings are not made to withstand earthquakes. Places like San Francisco are aware of earthquake risks and structures are built to withstand them." Quotes need to be cited. I'm sure it's the cite at the end of the para, but still.
• "Monitoring of the state's earthquake is facilitated by the United States Geological Survey at the Center for Earthquake Research and Information (CERI) at the University of Memphis. Birmingham has a seismic station which is part of the Advanced National Seismic System." While this is good for the article, I don't know if throwing it in at the end is best. It feels like an abrupt turn at the end of the article, but I'm not sure where else to put it.
• Ref #6 was a deadlink. It said .pd so I changed it to .pdf but I don't think that worked. What's the extension meant to be there?

I'll put the article on hold and pass when the issues are fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Believe I've fixed these? ceranthor 23:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Everything looks fixed from what I can see, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 23:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.mcema.net/earthquakes.asp
  • In 1916 Irondale earthquake on 2011-05-25 02:44:15, 404 Not Found
  • In 1916 Irondale earthquake on 2011-06-02 02:46:59, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1916 Irondale earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110103080705/http://www.gsa.state.al.us/gsa/geologichazards/earthquakes/eal.html to http://www.gsa.state.al.us/gsa/geologichazards/earthquakes/eal.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110104224205/http://www.gsa.state.al.us/gsa/geologichazards/earthquakes/USGSFortPaynePoster.pdf to http://www.gsa.state.al.us/gsa/geologichazards/earthquakes/USGSFortPaynePoster.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)