Talk:1920 APFA season/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Bald Zebra in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bald Zebra (talk · contribs) 12:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Great job overall, this article easily meets the Good Article Criteria and probably goes a long way to meeting the Featured Article Criteria too.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- All the sources check out, no dead links to report.
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Clear and concise language throughout.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Seven images used; one is from Commons, the others are all Public Domain
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: