Talk:1932 in chess
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To do
edit- Find more sources. Currently the article relies on a single source, Chess Review, Vol. 1, No. 1. Burgess should help.
- Sadly Burgess gives very little - The London and Berne tournament outcomes and a further Spielmann match (which I'll add). Otherwise he just gives some standout game positions/combinations from these events and the dismissive note - "With the great depression at its height, it is a year of few major tournaments". Brittle heaven (talk) 22:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Include some Soviet chess. 1932 probably wasn't a big chess year in the USSR, but because of #1 the page has a Western bias.
- Make sure we cover all the 1932 events found on List of strong chess tournaments.
- Consider adding all national champions we can find for 1932. It might be best to add them as a table.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1932 in chess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090102210932/http://www.rogerpaige.me.uk/tables3.htm to http://www.rogerpaige.me.uk/tables3.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)