Talk:1938 deportation of Jews from Slovakia/GA1

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 14:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I have currently gone through the page and made grammatical adjustments to make it flow better. I have also restructured some sentences to reduce the amount of short sentences.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    I have currently gone through most of the sources and they cover the information in this article. I can't find anything missing a needed source, although I may be wrong, and the claims in the lead are found in the article with proper sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    This article covers the events from the annexation of Czechoslovakia and partition of Slovakia to the deportation and aftermath of the event.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    I see no purposeful historical inaccuracies made or any apologetics for the activities of the Nazis.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    The most recent edits, barring my own, are from February and the last edit with over 1,000 bytes added was on February 12.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The images are all adequate and appropriately used.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    @Buidhe: I see no problems with this article and from your other GA Holocaust related articles I can see that you are very experienced with this subject. Since I am still new to this area I will wait for another reviewer to look over this and decided if it passes and considering how you currently have over thirty GAs under your belt it will be quick for something like that. :) - Jon698 Talk 14:43 3 April 2020
@BlueMoonset: Can you go over my review? - Jon698 Talk 14:48 3 April 2020
@Buidhe: After a few more days of viewing the article I still don't see anything wrong with it and I will be finishing the review. - Jon698 Talk 19:11 5 April 2020
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.