Talk:1946

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jim Michael in topic Mid-20th century baby boom


Year by topic

edit

I have put a general comment on year layout on my talk page, particularly on the way year by topic is dealt with. There are three different variants and I would like agreement to standardise. This would involve deleting the year by topic from the paragraph list on this page but keeping the box at the top --BozMo 14:05, 5 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)Reply

Format

edit

[See: Talk:1950#Format. -Wikid77 12:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)]Reply

Mensa International

edit

Please note that Mensa International is an umbrella organisation for the national Mensas, which means that when there was only the one original Mensa there was no umbrella organisation. :) 192.137.163.5 (talk) 07:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Mensa memberReply

Mid-20th century baby boom

edit

Seeing as how this year was when the Baby Boom began, shouldn't there be a note of it? I believe more people were born this year (at least in the US) than any other, although the succeeding years might offer some competition. Brutannica (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

according to some sources, the period January 1 1946 to December 31 1946 is the most people ever born in 365 days, a Guinnes Record. ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.230.94.194 (talk) 15:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Some countries had much more marked post-WW2 baby booms than others; some didn't have one at all. It shouldn't be on this article, but should be on year by country articles of countries which had a marked baby boom, including 1946 in the United States. Jim Michael (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply