Talk:1948 Tinker Air Force Base tornadoes/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Reaper Eternal (talk · contribs) 16:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Alright! I'll be reviewing this over the next couple days, performing minor copyedits and tweaks as I go along. When I'm done, I'll get back to you with my review. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

• Just out of curiosity, it has been almost a month since any activity in the review, so what is the state of it? Thanks and happy editing :) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 14:53, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

It's called I forgot to add it to my list of things to do. o_0 Sorry about that—I'll get to it today! Next time, feel free to drop a notification on my talk page after around one week, because I mentioned several days. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Alright! Here's my review! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Lead section

• You give the time for the first tornado in the body, but the time field in the infobox is empty. It should probably be added here.
  • I feel it would be a bit confusing to have a time in the infobox, since the article is about two different tornadoes which struck on different days at different times.-RunningOnBrains^(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

March 20 tornado

• Great work!

Investigation and tornado forecast

• Nothing seems amiss here.

March 25th tornado

• Is there a time for this tornado available in reliable sources that you could add both here and in the infobox?
  •  Done, though see my other comment about the infobox. -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Legacy

• The term "was a rousing success" just seems to be a slight NPOV issue. Is there another wording you could think of?
  •  Done-RunningOnBrains^(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

See also

• You could possibly add {{clear}} to prevent the wrapping of the == References == line.
  •  Done-RunningOnBrains^(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

References

• The accessdate for reference #5 is inconsistent with the others.
• All references look great apart from the minor formatting inconsistency!
  •  Done-RunningOnBrains^(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

External links

• I'm not certain what purpose this link serves. Furthermore, I cannot see the reason for appending The Tornado to the link. Could you explain?
  • Converted to a reference-RunningOnBrains^(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Overall

• This is a very excellently done article, and I will have no problems passing it. Great work! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry I took so long to respond, I have been a bit lax on my Wikiing recently. Let me know if you have any more concerns! -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

It's no problem! I forgot to start the review for a month too....

I've checked over the changes and they all seem good, so I'm going to pass this article now. I made a minor change to the template to hide the "time" parameter when not supplied. Thanks for your work! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)