Talk:1949 British Columbia general election

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comment on Coalition

edit

2 The candidate, running independently from the Liberal-PC Coalition, is listed as "Conservative" rather than "Progressive Conservative" in the Statement of Votes.

I'm weighing on this subject and will soon write an article on the Coalition, which should NOT be considered the sum of its two parts; it's also not a merger of the PROGRESSIVE Conservatives and the Grits; but only of the Conservatives; the PC name was only adopted in BC after the dissolution of the Coalition. The Coalition appeared on the ballot as a party, and is also not simply a temporary coalition of the other two parties as several members and candidates from each party did not partake of the Coalition, and fought it bitterly; this is why the Independent Conservative just mentioned, and the Progresssive Liberal elsewhere in '45 (George Murray in Lillooet). There's now a colour-code for the Coalition, but I won't interfere with the main results table here or in '45; not yet anywaySkookum1 21:29, 25 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Columbia general election, 1949. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply