Talk:1955 Atlantic hurricane season

Shelters

I think hurricane season should have more under ground shelters whitch could save more peoples lives so the population in that country would have more chance of living. Hurricanes are very powerful so for the rise of water you should have much more higher barries so in can prefent flooding in the country of america and the other countrys that have HURRICANES seasons. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.23.232.194 (talk • contribs) .

While I don't claim to have any expertise in the field, I think I can safely say that is completely impractical to have government-run hurricane shelters that serve no other purpose (schools, post offices and other government buildings are usually used in an emergency). The problem is that hurricanes do not strike any particular area very often. Even Florida is hit by a notable hurricane only once every few years, and almost everywhere else affected by hurricanes receives a major hit less than once in a decade. Furthermore, even in Florida, a hurricane that strikes the Florida panhandle will have no effects on the east coast and vice versa - each individual area is hit about once a decade. Keeping hurricane shelters running throughout 6 months of the year for a storm that hits once every decade is just not worthwhile. Government needs to work on disaster preparation, but not by building shelters. As for barricades - what do you barricade? Do you build a wall all along the entire Gulf coast and the east coast south of Virginia? Beachgoers won't like that, and it would cost well into the hundreds of billions of dollars. Some places do have flood protection. New Orleans was obviously the most notable example; the problem was not that protection didn't exist but rather that the protection was insufficient, and the city is in about the worst possible location for a city. - Cuivienen 05:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Todo

This article needs better balance in the storms section. The most significant storms have practically nothing on them. Jdorje 06:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Per David Longshore, the US Weather Bureau installed a large system of radars during the season. It's somewhere in that link. Useful info for when someone gets this to GA. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1851to2006_atl.txt
  • In 1955 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 03:32:53, 404 Not Found
  • In 1955 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-04 18:05:15, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

pre GAN

• No need for the commas in opening sentence.
• "with 13 known tropical cyclones" - I'd say "recorded" instead of "known"
• "caused 2 deaths " - spell the number
• "and contributed the flooding from Connie and Diane" - first, grammar, and second, did it? Ione was largely in NC, I thought.
• " Category 5 hurricane" - mention SSHS here
• "lashed several countries adjacent to the Caribbean Sea, as well as Mexico and British Honduras" - why not say "in the Caribbean"? Also, Mexico and B.H. are in Caribbean.
• "Tropical Storm Eleven" - this is a personal preference, but I hate seeing TS 11 written like this. Why not say there was a TS in October?
• "caused minor damage due to landfall in a sparsely populated area of Hispaniola" - get rid of "due to landfall"
• "totaling to at $200,000–$300,000" - awkward. You don't need "to" after total, and why not say "over $200,000"?
• " making it the costliest season at the time" - that's already said in the lede.

I was going to review the article, but I realized I have written a few sections, so here are my comments (just of the lede, btw). --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:23, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1955 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "The 1955 Atlantic hurricane season was, at the time, the costliest season ever recorded. The hurricane season officially began on June 15, and ended on November 15." switch the order of "season" and "hurricane season", but keep the wikilink. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Not sure what you are wanting me to do.--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "The hurricane season officially began on June 15, and ended on November 15." I'd add years to be consistent with other seasons. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Move the timeline graph to the season summary section. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "season proper" what does this mean? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• It means the actual season. In this context, it refers to how Alice developed in January, but the first storm during the season dates was Barbara.--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Say something like "within the offical hurricane season bounds" . YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Done--12george1 (talk) 03:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "in 2005 and 2006.[9][12][13]" link to seasons. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Done--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "due to unknown cause in the vicinity of Mobile, Alabama.[4]" why mention if it is unknown? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "although the rains from Connie contributed to flooding from Hurricane Diane that caused $700-800 million in damage.[4] " no need for the stuff after "that". Stuff like that IMO belongs in the season summary. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane}

• How about I just leave that damage figure out and say that flooding from Connie was a prelude to Diane?--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Gopher it. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "potentially as many as 200.[28]" I don't like this kind of speculation. The infobox in the awesome storm article says it was at least 184. IMO, this should be removed. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Well, I earlier in that sentence I said "there were at least 184 deaths", so I'm not quite speculating.--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Either way, IMO it is still redundant. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Done--12george1 (talk) 03:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• In Flora's section: "(ITCZ) " should not be part of the wikilink IMO. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "A tropical wave developed into a tropical depression early on September 10, while located between Cape Verde and the Lesser Antilles.[4] " is it me or should the word "midway" be in here somehow. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane}

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "During its extratropical stage, a ship in the area reported an atmospheric pressure as low as 979 mbar (28.9 inHg).[4]" which ship? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• The name of the ship is not specific in the source, which is the MWR.--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Boo. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Why was 11 not named? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane}

• Unlike for TS One in 1965, I cannot find an explanation for that due to lack of access to advisories.--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Any more info on Katie? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane}

• Nope, I checked for a while when I was re-writing this article and didn't come up with anything else worth adding.--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• "Names that were not assigned are marked in gray." is this needed? It says it is unused below next to the actual name. I know this is in every season article though. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Wikilink to newspapers with articles on their first usage since you do it in Ref 14, 34, and 26 I believe. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Remove "staff writer" in Ref 57. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fixed--12george1 (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and

(c) it contains no original research.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

YE ^{Tropical Cyclone}

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1955 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313072016/http://www.towb.org/Portals/0/HazardMitigationPlan.pdf to http://www.towb.org/Portals/0/HazardMitigationPlan.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)