Talk:1964 Brinks Hotel bombing/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Abraham, B.S. in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I have elected to review this article against the Good article criteria, and should have my initial comments posted up within the next few minutes. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 10:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- I have now completed reviewing this article against the criteria and am placing it on hold pending some concerns outlined below. This is quite a good article, and only requires a few minor improvements before GA. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 10:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- "the “major” told the hotel clerk..." - this is the first mention of a "major", and is slightly confusing. I presume you are referring to one of the VC agents? If so, this should be clarified.
- "and would go to a nearby café for replenishment" - I'm not sure replenishment is the right word in this context. Perhaps refreshment, or some such?
- "Some of out local squabbles will probably..." - is out correct? Or is it just a typo or a sic in the quote? It just doesn't seem right.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I used sustenance, as he could have had a proper meal. The rest are fixed and added an infobox as well. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 01:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, all looks good now. A nice addition to the store of Good articles. Congratulations and well done! Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 02:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)