Talk:1965 in the Vietnam War
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1965 in the Vietnam War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128160840/http://talkingproud.us/Military/ROKVIetnam/ROKVIetnamIntro.html to http://talkingproud.us/Military/ROKVIetnam/ROKVIetnamIntro.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507211238/http://www.sss.gov/induct.htm to http://www.sss.gov/induct.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Year in Numbers section?
editWhat's going on in the Year in Numbers section? Looks like it's trying to use Wikipedia as its own reference, and further uses a template that generates a table as another reference. Seems like a pretty big mess -- should this section simply be deleted? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Esemono, looks like this construct is due to your early edits in the article. are you still active on Wikipedia? Any input? Template:HCMC War Remnants Museum isn't itself referenced, and is used in five or six different articles as a reference itself ... which is very odd. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- It should be properly sourced, the figures must be available elsewhere. Mztourist (talk) 03:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)