Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Removed unsourced inclusions and uneeded quote. Why focus on what was said about the aftermath? There are probably two dozen quotes from players and media reflecting on the achievement rather than the afters. Monkeymanman (talk) 13:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Respectfully, you need a better reason than naked POV to remove verifiable material which is notable enough to receive significant coverage in the reliable source(s). Perhaps you could find one of these two dozen other quotes and add it for balance. 90.200.240.178 (talk) 16:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I am disappointed that you have again chosen to edit war out the material purely according to POV, rather than follow policy or use discussion here.
The 2008 uefa cup final has by far more relevant material to have its own article. I objected to various inclusions which were unsourced in that section and removed them. I also reverted back factually correct material which you ignored with your revisions. I objected to that quote from the manager because i think it was uneeded, and to be honest cherry picked. I really dont see what the problem is now with the section. Again by all means go through the relevant dispute resolution process. Monkeymanman (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Are you able to describe your "objections" and what you think is "relevant" or "unneeded" in terms of policy, rather than pure POV? 90.200.240.178 (talk) 19:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
What is being discussed here? The quote from the manager, or the numerous unsourced inclusions that were removed along with factually incorrect material? Monkeymanman (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your last inclusion, on the same grounds as before. Factually incorrect material reinserted, unsourced material, unverifiable material. Please feel free to go through the relevant dispute resolution if you want to. Monkeymanman (talk) 12:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
