Talk:1975 LaGuardia Airport bombing

Prior worst disaster on American soil

The NY Times says ONLY that "It was the worst death toll from a bomb explosion in New York City since a bomb went off in a parked horse-drawn wagon on Wall Street in 1920, killing more than three dozen people and injuring hundreds." As to the American soil claim, the Bath School Disaster in Bath, Michigan outdid the Wall Street bombing. One could quibble, I suppose, as to whether any of these events are a "terrorist act", a la the recent Fort Hood shooting, which some call 'mere work place violence.' But characterizing this kind of unspeakable carnage as anything less than terrorism is ignoring their reality; the perpetrator's motivation is an explanation and a way to define the act, but the carnage is more compelling. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're getting at with your last sentence, but I will say that prior to the identification of those suspected of perpetrating the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, I read something that said that nowadays, classifying an attack as an act of terrorism is determined by certain statutes. The writer brought up the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, saying that while it was not an act of terrorism, it was nonetheless terrifying. --anon. 71.183.138.52 (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

How one wants to pigeon-hole a particular act of violence can have consequences. These could be political (an administration claiming an absence of a "terrorist" attack, or someone wanting to call it "terrorism" to make a political point) or legal (denying additional benefits to survivors at Fort Hood because it was not "terrorism" and is instead "work place violence"). The latter could depend upon the interpretation of a particular statue or regulation. Of course, the facts ought to have some impact on these determinations, but experience teaches that is not always true. I agree with you that how you characterize it does not diminish how terrifying the event was. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:47, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1975 LaGuardia Airport bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080522050529/http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/12/24/ctv.laguardia/ to http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/12/24/ctv.laguardia/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

How seriously should we take this article?

The sources aren't very good, and the list of suspects includes everyone except Santa Claus and the Grinch. I think a major rewrite is needed using better sources. If I wanted to disinform my readers, this is how I would write it. Something is wrong with the framing here. Viriditas (talk) 21:22, 30 September 2023 (UTC)