Talk:1988 Football League Third Division play-off final/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HawkAussie (talk · contribs) 10:05, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Well I might pick up this one for you.

Lead

edit

Route to the Final

edit

Match

edit

Post-match

edit

References

edit
  • All good here.

Final comments

edit
HawkAussie any idea on when this might get reviewed? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@The Rambling Man: I have finished the review for you, just to need to fix up some errors and it will be all good to go. HawkAussie (talk) 11:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
HawkAussie I've addressed and/or responded to your issues above. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 16:54, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@The Rambling Man: Understand and that is a Good Article. HawkAussie (talk) 11:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply