Talk:1989 World Snooker Championship/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Links
editProse
editLede
edit- ranking professional snooker tournament - not a big fan of this wording, I think you can omit ranking here, and link it when you mention it later. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
General
edit- I think the overview/format should really have some sort of mention of the sessions, and how they work. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've had a go at this; suggestions for improvement welcome. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Overview doesn't comment on the prior championship. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Added a mention - is more needed? BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Qualifying could do with being split up a bit better in terms of paragraphs. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- I added a few details. The split is now between the last qualifying round, and earlier rounds. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 19:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Is it worth mentioning what rank Alex Higgins was, as we commented that he won an event shortly before this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- 7-4 - might be worth looking through or running the MOS:DASH script. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- For some reason the script didn't pick this one up. Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- eventually knocked out 4–13 - defeated. Knocked out is something that happens in boxing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Could we move the Parrott image to the semi-finals (where he won), and then put in a Steve Davis one for the final? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- red ball with his cue stick - might need some glossary links. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Added links. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- IIRC, didn't Parrott have to do some sort of exhibition as the match finished early? Certainly worth a mention if sources say about it. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- whilst 1989 proved to be the last world final reached by Davis - just say this was the last final for Davis. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Review meta comments
edit- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your constructive review, Lee Vilenski - I've replied to all the points above. Let me know about anything else that is needed. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Happy to pass. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)