Talk:1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election

File:David duke belgium 2008.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:David duke belgium 2008.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

This article's a bit one-sided.

I'm no fan of David Duke, but Edwin Edwards was not a much better choice. The article mentions Duke's ties to the KKK, but it says nothing about Edwards' allegations of wrongdoing. I believe you're doing readers an injustice by leaving that out. There's a reason why this was called "the race from hell". Voters felt they were having to choose between a racist and a thief.67.45.112.251 (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Duke is a liar. In the debate, he apologizes for his past comments on Jews and blacks but today makes a living off of anti-Semitic rants on his websites. Of course he was worse than Edwards. Ghoul flesh (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Ghoul

Yeah there needs to be a mention of his perceived corruption, "Vote for the lizard, not the wizard", etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Edwards#Second_comeback:_Edwards_vs._Duke,_1991 — Omegatron (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• David Duke em 1978 (cropped)2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)