Talk:1995 European Grand Prix/GA2

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 16:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Infobox

edit
  • Rain, later dried out, air temperature 11C (51F) - Is it possible to use {{convert}} so the ° symbol shows up?

Prose, POV, and coverage

edit

Lead

  • Damon Hill, Coulthard's teammate, started the race in second, but dropped down to third behind Schumacher at the start - "at the start" sounds out of place here (in my opinion) since the word "start" is repeated at the beginning of the sentence, even though these refer to two different things. How about "in the opening lap"?

Background

  • a late replacement for the cancelled Argentine Grand Prix. - is this relevant to the article?
  • the Japanese driver choosing not to race on doctors' advice - it's not as obvious that Katayama is Japanese. Well, many people can tell by the last name, but I'd suggest saying "the latter" instead of "the Japanese driver".

Practice and qualifying

  • The drivers, of whom only Berger and Brundle had raced at Nürburgring in a Formula One car before, were uninspired by the circuit - this reads a bit awkwardly.
  • Two practice sessions were held before the race; the first was held on Friday morning and the second on Saturday morning - I would also condense this, e.g. "Two practice sessions were held before the race: on Friday morning and on Saturday morning." Since there are only two, I assume "the first" and "the second" can be dropped.
  • As Hill was mathematically the only possible contender to challenge Schumacher for the championship, the question of if Williams should use team orders. - This looks like a run-on sentence. I don't quite understand what the last part of the sentence is trying to say.

Race

Post-race


Fantastic review as always epicgenius, let me know if there is any more I need to look at. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Lee Vilenski: No problem. There's just a few things with the references to smooth out. epicgenius (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
  • I wonder if it's possible to combine the various refs to the following, with either {{rp}} or shortened footnotes:
    • Henry, Alan (December 1995) [1995]. "1995 Grands Prix: Grand Prix of Europe". - refs 1, 8, 9, 14, 25
    • Domenjoz, Luc (1995). "The 17 Grand Prix - Grand Prix of Europe". - refs 3, 19, 30
    • Henry, Alan (December 1995) [1995]. "1995 Grands Prix: Portuguese Grand Prix". - refs 5 and 7
    • Henry, Alan (December 1995) [1995]. "1995 Grands Prix: Pacific Grand Prix". - refs 43 and 45
edit
  • Images are appropriately licensed.
  • Copyright checks did not bring up any issues.

General comments

edit