Talk:1999 Pacific hurricane season

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good article1999 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 3, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Todo

edit

Fix typos. They are tampant across the article. Hurricanehink 20:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Storm05, will you please use a spell-checker and a grammar checker. All one has to do is search wikipedia for "dissapated" to find a list of articles that you have edited. — jdorje (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Every storm needs sources and a decent meteorological history. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Came across this page while browsing the WikiProject, so I thought I'd do some copy-editing. Typos begone! -- wacko2 19:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1999 Pacific hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • "The season officially began on May 15 in the Eastern Pacific, and on June 1 in the Central Pacific; in both basins," just 140W lines here to avoid confusion on why CPAC storms are included in this article. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • The lead is a bit long for EPAC season articles: "Hurricane Dora was the most intense cyclone, with a peak intensity of 145 mph (220 km/h), equivalent to Category 4 hurricane status on the Saffir–Simpson hurricane scale. With a total track length of 6,500 mi (10,500 km), Dora had the second longest track of a Pacific hurricane on record, behind only Hurricane John in the 1994 season." just condense this to "Hurricane Dora was a long-lived an intense cyclone, which had the second longest track of a Pacific hurricane on record". YE Pacific Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

*Some of the extra details placed here could IMO be placed in the season summary. It summaries the season pretty well,just not inline with the other EPAC seasons. Looks like you already done that; you read my mind :). YE Pacific Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I'd touch base on Droa's WPAC history.
  • Add a note in Dora's infobox that it left the basin before dissipating. YE Pacific Hurricane
  • "While passing offshore, Irwin brought patches of heavy rainfall to some areas of Mexico, peaking at 9.92 inches (252 mm) in Coahuayutla de Guerrero, Guerrero.[12] T" mentioned this add the end of the paragraph, it's not like it affected multiple places. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well-written:  

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • Verifiable with no original research:
  •  

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  • Broad in its coverage:
  •  

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  •  

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  •  

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  •  

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. 

    YE Tropical Cyclone

    edit

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just added archive links to one external link on 1999 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

     Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified one external link on 1999 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply