Talk:1M1 Records

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Philip Powers
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Philip Powers

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 August 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1M1 Records is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment completed

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello to the editors of 1M1 Records,

As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed an rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: The article lacks a certain fluidity in several parts and provides no inline or supportive references.'

However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I only post my answer underneath your question.

ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS ^talk 02:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply