Talk:1st Canadian Division

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1st Canadian Division article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

British Empire Mid‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Military Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian military and military history task force

Military history: National / Canadian / North America / World War I / World War II / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

12th Bn

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi all, just provided a link from the 12th Bn to the Sherbrooke Hussars. However, it is unclear to me whether the SherH actually perpetuates the 12th, since al it says is that it "provided me to" the 12th. Comments? This page really needs to be sorted out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esseh (talk • contribs) 00:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

WWII

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Adolf Hitler Line article states that the 1st broke that line. However this article implies the 1st acted in WWI only. Not good. Maury 00:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal with 1st Canadian Infantry Division

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge MCG (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

According to the 1st Canadian Division's web page ([1]), the First World War division is the same organization as the 1st Canadian Infantry Division of the Second World War, and it is the same organization as the 1st Canadian Division of the Cold War and today. In the tradition of the 1st Infantry Division (United States) or 1st Infantry Division (United Kingdom), a division's full history is contained in a single article. MCG (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Support - It makes no sense to have two articles for a single formation that has been raised on multiple occasions. I say go for it. GrahamNoyes (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic