Talk:1st Iowa Infantry Regiment/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Pickersgill-Cunliffe in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 16:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Prelim
edit- No duplicated links
- No edit wars
- Image is correctly licensed
- Earwig reports copyvio unlikely
Lede and infobox
edit- "and was officially mustered" doesn't currently make grammatical sense. Suggest starting "the regiment was officially..." as a new sentence
- Have changed this around a bit
- Link Boonville, Missouri
- done
- Link companies
- done
- Add ACW to infobox as a treelist heading, and Battle of Dug Springs
- done
- "May 14, 1861, to August 20 or 23, 1861" > "May 14 – August 20/23 1861"?
- Done
- It should be role=Infantry and branch=Union Army
- Done
- Could could also add size=c.780 and notable_commanders = William H. Merritt
- have linked Merritt, and was finally able to trace a claim of a strength of 959 total enrollment that had been in the article earlier to an obscure 1908 government report, and have added that
Service
edit- I think the two sentences beginning "The American Civil War began on April 12, 1861..." are a little too detailed and off topic for the regiment. It would be appropriate to move much more quickly into the call for volunteers and forming of the regiment
- On the contrary, I think it's a bit useful as context for why these Iowa and Missouri and Arkansas farm boys decided all of a sudden to start shooting at each other. See, for instance, the background that wound up getting hashed out at the FAC for 8th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate).
- It would be useful to mention somewhere in the formation section that the regiment being raised is an infantry regiment
- Added
- Link companies
- Done
- Link militia
- Done
- " after the men had"
- Oops, fixed
- Do we have any descriptions of the uniforms?
- Have added a little bit on this; it was an absolute mess of different colors and styles
- "On June 13," try not to begin paragraphs with dates
- Rephrased
- Give Lyon his rank
- done
- "where it guarded the Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad." from what?
- Clarified
- "Lyon's advance from Boonville" a word or two on what the plan was?
- Added a sentence each in a couple different place to explain this
- Give Sturgis his rank
- Done
- Give Sigel his rank
- Done
- "bits and pieces over the next several days"
- Done
- Give Sweeny his rank
- Done, although this took more digging to find than it was probably worth
- Give Price and McCulloch their ranks
- Added; it's surprisingly hard to track down good explicit page number references to ranks; thankfully both Price and McCulloch appear in the orbat at the end of Brooksher
- I think it could be made clearer if/when the regiment decides/is made to fight instead of stay in Springfield
- As to when, I had to follow down some rabbit holes in Piston & Hatcher's footnotes, but was able to track down a date in a book published in 1907 by a veteran of the regiment. The sources don't give much info as to decides/is made to fight, as it appears to have been moot; it's not like the regiment actually attempted to back out on the battle.
- Give Dietzler his rank
- Done
- "While the 1st Missouri Infantry Regiment, an artillery unit," this reads as if the 1st Missouri is an artillery unit
- Rephrased
- What part of the battle is the image caption actually referring to?
- Had to track down the original magazine article it was published in, but have provided some more detail here
References
edit- References look good. AGF for print sources.
- Dyer and Ingersoll could do with OCLC numbers
- Added for both, although it took a bit of guesswork as to which OCLC # is the best one, as both of the works have gone through scads of editions
@Hog Farm: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your responses. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Pickersgill-Cunliffe: - replies above. I had to dig into some rabbit holes to track down some stuff, but I believe have replied to everything. Two sources added: an official government document from 1908, and a veteran's memoir from 1907. The memoir is only used to support a date; it probably has more detail but I don't think that relying heavily on one veterans' recollections from 46 years after the fact is really due weight. Hog Farm Talk 02:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Happy with your changes. A few minor quibbles:
- "The total number of men enrollment in the regiment was 959." needs adjustment
- Colonel and major are duplicated links, although they're in different sections so you can keep them if you like
- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Pickersgill-Cunliffe: - I have addressed both of these issues. Hog Farm Talk 02:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Passing this article as satisfying the GA criteria. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Pickersgill-Cunliffe: - I have addressed both of these issues. Hog Farm Talk 02:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Happy with your changes. A few minor quibbles: