Talk:2/48th Battalion (Australia)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Anotherclown in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Progression

edit
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [[1]]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [[2]]

Technical review

edit

Criteria

edit
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  • IMO it is well written and MOS compliant.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • All information is cited to reliable sources and there is no original research that I can find.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • Major aspects are covered.
  • It is written from a neutral POV, is a fair representation of events and uses all major works available.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  • Although there has been considerable recent work, the article is not subject to an edit war.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):   d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':  
  • Images are appropriate for the article, and are tagged and captioned;
  • Images is a non-free image, but has an appropriate free-use rationale.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  
Overall this is a another good battlion history. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 11:09, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply