Talk:2000 Austrian Grand Prix
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Nascarking in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2000 Austrian Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 Austrian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 6, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Austrian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 16:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The number of primary sources with this one is more than a quarter of the references, but not too many to cause concern.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I have a concern with the picture of David Coulthard. Specifically, the water mark on the picture screams copyright infringement. Unless that was uploaded by a Wiki user who just happens to own Harcourt, I would suggest using a different photo of Coulthard.
- The objectionable picture has been replaced. Z105space (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the change.--Nascar king 17:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- The objectionable picture has been replaced. Z105space (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have a concern with the picture of David Coulthard. Specifically, the water mark on the picture screams copyright infringement. Unless that was uploaded by a Wiki user who just happens to own Harcourt, I would suggest using a different photo of Coulthard.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass:
- The only thing preventing this from passing was the watermark on the David Coulthard picture. Now that it has been changed, I hereby give 2000 Austrian Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 16:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Nascarking: The sole problem has been rectified. 17:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Z105space (talk) 17:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- The only thing preventing this from passing was the watermark on the David Coulthard picture. Now that it has been changed, I hereby give 2000 Austrian Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 16:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Pass:
