Talk:2000 Hungarian Grand Prix
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Dawnseeker2000 in topic GA Review
 | 2000 Hungarian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 6, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2000 Hungarian Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Hungarian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs) 22:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Dawnseeker2000 and I'll be reviewing this article. There will be some time to get a start on it today, but as I'm a fairly inexperienced reviewer, this may take some time. The good news is that the article looks great; very well organized and nice to look at. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 22:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This article has a great presentation. It's neat with nice full paragraphs and has good continuity.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- I swapped one reference (for the Minardi drivers qualifying last) but all other spot checks were fine.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- I find that for an average F1 race with not too much off the beaten path, this article is complete in its description of the events.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Again, the article reads well. Just the facts; and there are a lot of them. Good job.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images of Hakkinen and Shumacher have CC licenses.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I'm passing this article. I still prefer to watch the races, but this is a good read.
- Pass/Fail:
Good work on this article. I'm promoting it. Dawnseeker2000 03:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)