Talk:2000 SG344

gigagrams?

Who on earth talks about gigagrams? Kilos - fine, tonnes - fine, but gigagrams - no. Also, when did using multiples of the weight of the Titanic become standard/relevant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.46.110 (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/mpec/K00/K00U19.html}}
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-05-25 07:01:06, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-06-10 05:47:35, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast06nov_2.htm}}
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-05-25 07:01:05, 404 NOT FOUND
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-06-10 05:48:07, 404 NOT FOUND

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/07/starsgalaxiesandplanets.spaceexploration}}
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-05-25 07:01:03, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-06-10 05:48:10, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 4

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K00/K00U24.html}}
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-05-25 07:01:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-06-10 05:48:29, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 5

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K00/K00V26.html}}
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-05-25 07:01:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 SG344 on 2011-06-10 05:48:30, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

S-IVB booster stage is far less massive than this estimated size

2000 SG344 is listed as having a mass of seventy million kilograms (assuming it's a rocky sphere). S-IVB is listed as having a mass of one hundred thousand kilograms.

Those are not even the same order of magnitude. If there is still a possibility that they are one and the same, where is this complete uncertainty coming from? -- 99.118.9.187 (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

The true mass of 2000 SG344 is unknown and can only be estimated from the best-guess for the diameter. -- Kheider (talk) 14:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Kheider, big fan of this article. Linked to it on Reddit's /r/space subreddit, and this disparity in weights caused confusion there too. I've added a photograph and edited the phrasing of the size and weight in the opening paragraph to include the doubt over its veracity, but I wouldn't be surprised if phrases like "is believed to" are frowned upon in space wikipedia articles. Please adjust as appropriate. Tommilsom (talk) 16:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2000 SG344. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2000sg344.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130529175100/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/ to http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/07/starsgalaxiesandplanets.spaceexploration

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2000 SG344. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090117170401/http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast06nov_2.htm to http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast06nov_2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)