Talk:2000 San Marino Grand Prix
2000 San Marino Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 3, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Italy may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 San Marino Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: EnthusiastWorld37 (talk · contribs) 20:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 04:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
I'll review this article. I'll note upfront that if you disagree/don't understand my comment, push back/ask. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 04:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Leaving some initial comments below.
Apologies for the delay here. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
All done Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Prose and content
editFormula One World Championship, and the season's
Remove the comma, per WP:CINSrun four laps longer than Häkkinen during his second stint.
step this out so it is clearer for a lay reader, given it is the lede.- I would like to see it mentioned mentioned in the lede who ultimately won the 2000 Formula One World Championship to give a full context for the race, although I understand if this is not normal practice for articles of this type.
- This is not standard practice for articles at GA level EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
practiced starts for durability purposes
could you explain this to me?shookdown
link shakedown (testing)while McLaren scored no points due to their unreliable car, and driver David Coulthard was disqualified
better use of conjunctions, as it appears Coulthard was on a separate team to McLaren.possible world championship victory,[21] but Ferrari improvements
different conjunction, inappropriate SYNTH, implications for Schumacher celebrating a possible world championship victoryadmitted
WP:SAIDwith a concentration on
active voice for concision
Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 04:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Rollinginhisgrave: Have made changes based on the above points EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
BAR car failed due to a
fuel leak caused by afailed fuel pipeline, dropping oil over the trackwith a low chance of rain
don't need to mention this unless the weather changes through the day.mechanicsm
sppushed too hard
can you be more clear on thishe had to slow for yellow flags
why was this?the fastest driver to miss the top ten due to
->after
too much detailand costing him time
rmvFor the last 15 minutes,[49] Button selected the medium compound tyres but being unacquainted with the track following hydraulic issues earlier in the day and him forcing himself to mount the kerbs left him in 18th.
does this sentence make sense?in the hopes of improving race performance
rmvMassimo Trebbi
you don't have to mention the mechanic's name.but was moved into the pit lane
was tenseand his immediate reaction was to aggressively prevent Coulthard
wordy, use active voiceBarrichello appeared hesitant to overtake his teammate Michael Schumacher
attributethe former to
just use surnames as this gets a bit confusingwhile Ralf Schumacher lost momentum... falling from fifth to ninth
break up sentence, too longin a battle for third
less colloquialwere battling for
^.[3][77]As
spacefactors., adding
but called it
better conjunction
Suggestions
edit- Consider linking tifosi
Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Sources
edit- I notice www.formula1.com seems to have undergone a change in ownership. Can you tell me why this is considered RS?
- This version is before Formula One itself took over the running and maintenance of the website. However, it did have staff members. EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 04:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- [7]
- [14]
- [21]
- [28] I might be missing it, but I can't really figure out what info you're citing here, and there's a lot of text. Might be best if you can point it out.
- I am primarily citing the text that states the format of the race, particularly practice, qualifying and warm-up EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 04:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- [35]
- [42]
- [49a]
- [56]
- [70]
- [80]
Other
edit- Neutral
- No COPYVIO/OR 74.2% earwig, all quotes
- Broad / summary style
- Stable
- Images: appropriately tagged PD, CC
Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Rollinginhisgrave: Have made further amendments to the article based on your most recent feedback. Please let me know if I missed anything or is there is something else that needs addressing EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 04:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)