Talk:2000 World Series

Fair use rationale for Image:World Series 2000.gif

Image:World Series 2000.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Mitchell Report

I don't see any reason why this article shouldn't mention that nine of the Yankees were implicated in the Mitchell Report. Kingturtle (talk) 00:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

• Because it has no bearing on the World Series unless MLB decides to revoke WS won by roiders. Plus I'm going to take a flier that you aren't suggesting adding this to every WS. Staxringold _talk^contribs 00:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Yankee Verbosity

Why is the following sentence in the preamble? ---It would be the last World Series title the Yankees would win for nine years; they lost the 2001 World Series to the Arizona Diamondbacks and the 2003 World Series to the Florida Marlins.--- How is this relevant to the 2000 WS page? Who cares if the Yankees went 2 centuries without another title, and lost 100 WS on the way. Why doesn't the 2004 WS article say "this would be the last WS the Red Sox would win for three years"? I know why, because it's irrelevant. I don't give a crap the Yankees went winless in the WS for 9 years. I don't need to be told it anywhere except within the Yankee team page article itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.79.96.4 (talk) 07:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

You're right. These does not belong to the preamble section. Let's treat these as "further reading" and move to the bottom "Aftermath" section.--NullSpace (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• NYCS R36 subway series 2000 Mets.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• NYCS R142 subway series 2000 Yankees.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2024

The article states it was referred to the “subway series” and that’s an error. It was referred to the “Subway World Series”. A play on to the annual match up dubbed the subway series. 2600:8803:B11F:CB00:9CA4:8290:94CF:77B7 (talk) 03:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Charliehdb (talk) 05:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)