Talk:2001 Japanese House of Councillors election

Proportional representation results: Candidate list format

I know that the Japanese Wikipedia sometimes uses this format, putting all elected candidates from all parties into one list. This would make sense if the seat distribution was exclusively determined by candidate votes. But I think the format used by the election authorities and most media, i.e. separate lists by party is more intelligible – and makes more sense because the candidate votes per se only determine the ranking within one party list and only the relative strength of candidates of the same party is of relevance. But maybe other readers disagree – I've never found it easy to present Japanese election results to non-Japanese readers in an easily comprehensible way. (But judging from what some international media occasionally publish, others haven't even tried.) Objections? Better ideas? --Asakura Akira (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Japanese House of Councillors election, 2001. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100122134612/http://www.senkyo.janjan.jp/election/2001/99/00002009.html to http://www.senkyo.janjan.jp/election/2001/99/00002009.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218215907/http://www.jnu.ac.in/main.asp?sendval=Library to http://www.jnu.ac.in/main.asp?sendval=Library

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)