Talk:2001 Molson Indy Toronto

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2001 Molson Indy Toronto/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  18:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found.

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the MoS. I was going to change a couple of things but decided against it, seeing as it wouldn't have made much of a difference!
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Sufficient detail
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I really couldn't spot any issues from this one. All of these articles you've nominated seem to be flawless. Promoted! JAGUAR  19:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply