Talk:2002 Austrian Grand Prix
2002 Austrian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 11, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2002 Austrian Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from 2002 Austrian Grand Prix appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 October 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Similar event the year before?
editSomeone amended Formula One to add details of a similar Ferrari 'team orders' incident in 2001. The words added were as follows:
In the Austrian Grand Prix in 2001, Rubens Barrichello, Schumacher's teammate at Ferrari who was 2nd in the race, was ordered by Ferrari to allow Schumacher to overtake him under "team orders". Barrichello let him pass on the last lap at the finish line. But this was further uproar to come at the same track the following year when the same situation happened, only this time, it was for the lead of the race. And not only did Barrichello slow down to let Schumacher through, the world champion made his embarrased team-made stand on the top-step of the podium which caused outrage with the supporters at the circuit and around the world. As a direct consequence of this controversial race, the FIA banned any further use of team orders in the new rules and regulations and fined the Ferrari team $1million for their actions. It was Ferrari all the way
If this is accurate, we could mention here that a similar incident occured the year before. I haven't checked the accuracy of the statement, though. I've deleted it from the main F1 article as being too much detail for an article which is already over long and slightly incidental. 4u1e 18:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
YouTube links
editThis article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on 2002 Austrian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081210184602/http://www.f1db.com:80/exec/section/grandprix/action/result/id/20020512 to http://www.f1db.com/exec/section/grandprix/action/result/id/20020512#race_startgrid
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2002 Austrian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017081855/http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press_Releases/The_FIA/2002/260602-01.html to http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press_Releases/The_FIA/2002/260602-01.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 03:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- ... that the use of team orders by Ferrari to determine the winner of the 2002 Austrian Grand Prix led to a ban on the practice in Formula One from 2003 to 2010? Source: Rubinho diz que foi ameaçado para dar posição a Schumacher em 2002 – Rede Globo & Barrichello Reveals He Queried Team Orders in Austria – Atlas F1
- ALT1:... that Ferrari used team orders on driver Rubens Barrichello to allow his teammate Michael Schumacher to win the 2002 Austrian Grand Prix and earn more World Drivers' Championship points? Source: Changes steer towards more open Formula One – The Sydney Morning Herald & F1 chiefs drop the ban on team orders in new rules – BBC Sport
- ALT2:... that after he won the 2002 Austrian Grand Prix through team orders, driver Michael Schumacher gave the first-place trophy to his Ferrari teammate Rubens Barrichello at the post-race podium ceremony? Source: Formula One: Barrichello ushers Schumacher to first – International Herald Tribune
5x expanded by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC).
- This article is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and any of the hooks could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. A QPQ has been done. I remember the race well and the controversy it caused. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 Austrian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 02:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Lead
|
---|
|
Background
|
---|
|
Practice
|
---|
|
Qualifying
|
---|
|
Warm-up
|
---|
|
Race
|
---|
|
Post-race
|
---|
|
Race classification
|
---|
|
Overall
- Nicely done, MWright96. Plenty of comments above but nothing major. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Have made changes were possible. In response to asking whether it is redundant to mention turn names, I have changed them to a generic meaning since their names have changed but mentioning where on the circuit an overtake or accident happened is not redundant. MWright96 (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, MWright96. I'll go through the responses tomorrow. What I meant about the redundancy is that, taking "Remus Kurve turn" for an example, it basically means "Remus Corner turn"; "corner" and "turn" mean the same thing here. So I would think just "Remus Kurve" and similar would do. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have changed them to something generic so that does not need to be done MWright96 (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Passing now. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have changed them to something generic so that does not need to be done MWright96 (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, MWright96. I'll go through the responses tomorrow. What I meant about the redundancy is that, taking "Remus Kurve turn" for an example, it basically means "Remus Corner turn"; "corner" and "turn" mean the same thing here. So I would think just "Remus Kurve" and similar would do. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Have made changes were possible. In response to asking whether it is redundant to mention turn names, I have changed them to a generic meaning since their names have changed but mentioning where on the circuit an overtake or accident happened is not redundant. MWright96 (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2020 (UTC)