2002 LG Cup (snooker) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 12, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2002 LG Cup (snooker) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 LG Cup (snooker)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 12:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Links
editProse
editLede
edit- Grand Prix snooker tournament - reword to avoid WP:SEAOFBLUE. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Short description? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe worth mentioning it was called the LG cup as it was sponsored by LG. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- 150/1 outsider - don't start a sentence with a number Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Might be worth mentioning that Small retired due to the disease just three years after this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Done all MWright96 (talk) 08:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
General
edit- which was won by Peter Ebdon, his first victory in the event and the world number 3.[ - this sentence doesn't make sense written this way round. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- The winners of round 1 went (either round one, or round 1, not both) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- On that note, is it round one, two etc, or last 48, last 32, last 16 etc? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- You'll have to do flagathlete for the last 32 as well, as there are flags not in the first round (see Quinten Hann). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- All done MWright96 (talk) 16:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Review meta comments
edit- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: Have addressed each of the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 16:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)