Talk:2005 Canadian federal budget

Untitled

Shouldn't the budget articles be named "Canadian federal budget, 2005" to follow the format used for elections? This is also semi-endorsed by the Wikipedia style manual. Kevintoronto 17:48, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Would anyone object to me making this change? Kevintoronto 22:01, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Relevance

I'm actually wondering why this article exists. I tried searching a couple of other budgets and found nothing and I doubt it's common practice to include items like this. If there something that made it particularly unusual or interesting, maybe (i.e., the budget in 78 which brought down the gov't) but as it stands I think this should be eliminated. --Marskell 18:29, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I see this as more of an argument for getting to work on covering all of the budgets. - SimonP 18:40, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

Bill C-48 & 43

Bill C-48 and Bill C-43 redirect here, but neither is mentioned in the article. --Menchi 07:16, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Chuck Cadman, 2005 budget vote.jpg

The image Image:Chuck Cadman, 2005 budget vote.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)