Talk:2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Untitled

Archives: Events

Names

I put a list up. If you don't think it works, you can take it down, but I think it helps the article. Hurricanehink 22:05, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Keep it. -- RattleMan 22:12, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

I was not aware North IO cyclones are assigned names nowadays - this began in 2004, correct? I assume list is maintained by RSMC New Delhi? --Mikoyan21 19:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

This began in September 2004. The WMO/ESCAP Panel members agreed to continue this naming system this year. [1](Refer to Ch.6) Momoko

Should only the names that were used be mentioned in the article? 2006 currently has all names used in the season and the next five names. Every name is not needed for this article. Hurricanehink 02:13, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Article split?

The 2005 section of the article is enough to justify being its own separate article. Assuming future years follow suit (and I just read this was an active season, so maybe that's a bad assumption), we can probably go year-by-year starting with 2005. Jdorje 00:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

That sounds good. In fact, I think I'll do just that. Hurricanehink 01:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

WMO report

The first report from the WMO on the 2005 seasons is available: [2]. Lots of data there....--Nilfanion (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• [3]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://cidi.org/disaster/05b/ixl10.html
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-12 02:23:29, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://cidi.org/disaster/05b/ixl38.html
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-12 02:24:02, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://cidi.org/disaster/05b/ixl161.html
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-12 02:24:05, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 4

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/tc2005bt.htm
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 05:41:06, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 07:36:39, 404 Not Found
  • In 2002 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 04:41:31, 404 Not Found
  • In 2003 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 06:12:56, 404 Not Found
  • In 2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 08:45:45, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-12 02:24:14, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 5

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/tc2006bt.htm
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 05:40:56, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 07:36:49, 404 Not Found
  • In 2002 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 04:41:41, 404 Not Found
  • In 2003 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 06:13:01, 404 Not Found
  • In 2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 08:45:57, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-12 02:24:24, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 6

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.wmo.ch/web/www/TCP/OperationPlans/TCP21-OP2005.pdf
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:07, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 05:41:15, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 07:36:58, 404 Not Found
  • In 2002 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 04:41:50, 404 Not Found
  • In 2003 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 06:13:10, 404 Not Found
  • In 2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-11 08:46:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-12 02:24:34, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned references in 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ngp":

• From 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season: "Monthly Global Tropical Cyclone Summary November 2001". Gary Padgett. 2002. Retrieved 2014-05-15.
• From 2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season: Gary Padgett (2005-05-17). "Monthly Tropical Weather Summary for November 2004". Australia Severe Weather. Retrieved 2015-05-30.
• From 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season: Gary Padgett (2000). "Monthly Tropical Weather Summary for November 2000". Retrieved 2015-05-22.
• From 2003 North Indian Ocean cyclone season: "Monthly Global Tropical Cyclone Summary November 2003". Gary Padgett. 2003. Retrieved 2014-05-01.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jason Rees (talk · contribs) 01:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Hurricanehink, I am going to attempt to review this article for GAN.Jason Rees (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

• First off all most if not all of the other seasonal articles have the timeline image, on top of the seasonal summary section rather than below it.

• True, not sure why it was done this way. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• During the season - what season?

• It's synonymous with "the year". ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• storms - might be better to use the general term here and call them cyclonic disturbances

• Sounds good. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• No systems strengthened beyond cyclonic storm status - If so why is Fanoos classified on the timeline as a severe cyclonic storm?

• Beats me, I fixed it. Could have been a typo. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Might be good to see a basic summary - take 1990 as a basic example of what i mean

• I disagree, respectfully. There is a basic summary in the lead already. No need for an additional one in the SS. 1990 could probably use its summary for its lead (which is only one paragraph long). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Hibaru could do with a few tweaks to make it more readable IMO.

• I believe I got this. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Try changing The convection consolidated as an elongated circulation became evident. to Over the next few days the convection consolidated as an elongated.... I suggest this as I feel like the reader needs some concept to time here.Jason Rees (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

• Good idea. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• Dead link - 2005 IMD ATCR

• Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Im surprised Land Depression 1 and BOB 02 have sections, I suspect they could be put into the other systems section quite easily.

• I moved BOB 02, since it was very short. Land Depression 1 has two paragraphs, so I opted to keep it separate.

• Generally speaking I think its better if you do not mention the winds in depressions/deep depressions in this basin its only either 25 kts or 30 kts.

• I didn't think it hurt to specify. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• No but I think it would make the article more readable in places.Jason Rees (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• OK, I mostly adjusted the deep depressions and removed the wind references there. That work? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• On January 13, the IMD designated the system as a depression. -> remove the a and put Depression BOB 01.

• Do I have to? It's not mentioned in that source, and I don't feel like finding a source for that exact name :P Plus, I don't name any of the other D/DD's. Is that OK? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• The system organized further and developed rainbands. -> Whats the difference between rainbands and convection?

• Rainbands are convection that spiral around the circulation, like pinwheels on a bike. Well-organized rainbands are signs of good outflow, but outflow is the mechanism, whereas rainbands are the physical feature. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• it was classified by the IMD on September 17 -> As what? An elephant or BOB 02

• A depression :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok everything looks good now and im passing.Jason Rees (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)