Talk:2006 California Insurance Commissioner election

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Untitled

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Since this was the only Republican statewide victory in the 2006 elections besides Schwarzenegger, it might be worth a sentence or two about the reasons for the outcome, if there are sources to cite on that subject. Was it something in particular about the office of Insurance Commissioner? Personal popularity of Poizner? Personal unpopularity of Bustamante? Something else? --Delirium (talk) 01:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, I can't discern any obvious reason, though I have a few guesses. According to this article from SFGate:

https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Insurance-firms-contribute-big-to-Bustamante-2500728.php

the fact that Bustamante was being heavily supported by the insurance industry may have rubbed people the wrong way. One other possibility would be this from the San Mateo Daily Journal:

https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/world/poizner-bustamante-fight-for-insurance-commissioner/article_c9f6df5f-106e-5bca-9a3b-7b4a6e880621.html

Perhaps Bustamante's overemphasis on his attempts to lose weight made people think he wasn't serious enough. That being said, Poizner had no experience in the insurance industry up till then. None of these explainations is completely satisfying, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C51:797F:EAAE:415:1A4C:EAEE:1E10 (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Also, this East Bay Times article (endorsing Poizner) accuses Bustamante of position shopping and lacking any real desire to regulate the insurance industry:

https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2006/10/02/poizner-best-pick-for-insurance-commissioner-2/

Also, I was the one who added that fact about 9 months ago. This is where I got it from:

https://www.citywatchla.com/index.php/los-angeles/15662-ex-insurance-boss-poizner-seeks-non-partisan-re-do — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C51:797F:EAAE:415:1A4C:EAEE:1E10 (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic