Talk:2006 Chadian coup attempt

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Chadian-sudanese conflict

edit

Once all the info has been gathered, which I'll work on tomorrow, this'll need to be incorporated into Chadian-Sudanese conflict, Tripoli Agreement, and the SCUD page. My source for the last expansion: http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/africa/03/15/chad.coup.reut/index.html?section=cnn_latest KI 04:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

KI’s edits

edit

I have some questions regarding KI’s edits.

  • The actual quote that Hourmadji Moussa Doumngor said is “their occupants neutralised” with an “s” see here: [1]. So why are you changing it?
  • Why is there an “e” here: Tim and Timam(e) Erdimi”?
1. That's a Reuters rendering of the word, which is spelled in American english with a z.
2. Timam is usually, but not always spelled with a "z."
3. The links as I had them directly link to what I wrote, and dont have misleading redirects. The "proper titles" arent any more proper than what I have linking to them. Using redirects is not looked down upon. Please review Wikipedia policy. KI 03:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Hourmadji Moussa Doumngor issued a writen statement, changing the spelling changes the quote.
  • If Timam is sometimes spelled with a "z" why is there an "e"?
  • What's wrong with linking [[Chadian President]] as [[Chad|Chadian]] [[Head of state of Chad|President]]? This way there is a link for "Chad" and the president. – Zntrip 03:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Doumngor's statement was in French, not English, and neutralized is a translation. I meant Timam is sometimes spelled with an "e." The links as you have them are misleading. "Chad President" is a title; it should link to the president. KI 16:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I understand the Timam(e) thing and it doesn't really matter which way "neutralized" is spelled, but "Chadian President" is not a title. In Chad the call him "President". "President" is his title. – Zntrip 21:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

5 out of the 6 external links being used as sources were dead; I managed to find replacements for two of them. Unfortunately I think a reader would need access to Lexis-Nexis to confirm the rest of our sources. Everyking 00:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Chadian coup d'état attempt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply