Talk:2006 FIFA World Cup sponsorship

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merger

edit

This is merely a worthy section in the main 2006 FIFA World Cup article. Kingjeff 22:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

It was forked due to the current length of the World Cup page and the constant growth of the page. Leave it here is my thought. Batman2005 00:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

NPOV

edit

As the main architect of this article, I don't mind saying that it needs some pretty intense editing to make it NPOV. I encourage someone to try and find some evidence about how the profits are good for football and so forth, and just otherwise clean this up. Vickser 20:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2006 FIFA World Cup sponsorship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply