Talk:2006 Speedway Grand Prix

Latest comment: 13 years ago by JeffGBot in topic Dead link 11

Standings for track reserves

edit

Updated table after Latvian GP.

I'm a bit unsure about what to do with the bottom part of it though. The official table at http://www.speedwayworld.tv/en/sgpchamp06 only includes wild-cards, but not track reserves unless they score points. It's not completely consequent though, since Tomicek is missing, despite scoring 4 pts as shown at http://www.speedwayworld.tv/en/sgp/en/sgp/a6730

We seem to be quite inconsistent ourselves between writing 0 pts for those that took part, and ns for those who never took to the track. Right now i don't think it's correct.

Maybe we should stop at Carpanese too? Thoughts? /Kriko 17:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think we should agree with the SGP way of doing it. Track reserves should only count when they score points. I think their omission of Tomicek is simply a mistake. I remember last year Edward Kennett scored in Cardiff and did appear so this is certainly the right treatment, so I agree we should stop at Carpanese. --Jsydave 12:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Done. Good job by the way, splitting the article, Jsydave. /Kriko 16:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply