Talk:2006 Texas A&M Aggies football team

United States: Texas / Texas A&M Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Texas A&M (assessed as Low-importance).

College football Mid‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Questions

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I put two questions relevant to this article at the bottom of Talk:Texas A&M Aggies. Johntex\^talk 04:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reference 33 which purports to contain an interview in which Colt McCoy states that neither hit at the end of the '06 UT-A&M game was dirty does not contain such statements. Either the two sentences which refer to McCoy's opinion on the hits should be removed or a relevant citation should be provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.102.201 (talk) 04:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Limas Sweed's Pass interference

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems to me that most people felt the PI call was good; all non-blogs don't mention any controversy. If I remember correctly, the announcers first thought it was a bit of a stretch for the PI call, but recanted when they saw Sweed push off the facemask of the defender (as depicted in the photo). They said something like, "Any time the reciever puts his hand up on the facemask and extends his arm pushing the defender's face away from the play, you're going to get a pass interference call." Including a comment from like this makes it seem like everyone thought that it was a BS call, when in fact, most sports announcers/agencies agreed with it. I'm not saying the Austin-American Statesman isn't an appropriate source, but the quote comes from a reporter's blog and is not substantiated anywhere else (other than other blogs...).

As such, I think it violates WP:UNDUE. Thoughts? — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply