Talk:2006 Tri Nations Series

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Description

edit

Should we adda small description of the matches, maybe next t o the wikinews link, like a short paragraph? Cvene64 05:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't really think so, because then people will complain about P.O.V., unless we reference well.--HamedogTalk|@ 10:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pitch background

edit

Maybe we should kind of wash over the pitch colour with white, or a faded pattern or something, as the Springbok jersey needs to be alot darker, as, as it stands, it could be confusing with Ireland. Thoughts? Cvene64 08:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, but make sure you change the blank image to, which can be found in those images cats.--HamedogTalk|@ 08:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Actually, just leave because Ireland aint in the Tri Nations, so there is minimal chance of confusion. Also, when Ireland plays RSA, usally, one plays in white, meaning it doesn't really matter.--HamedogTalk|@ 21:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pitch text

edit

I believe the text should be in white because it is difficult to view the black text at the moment. Jpe|ob 05:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Then change it, cos I aint, it takes ages to fiddle around with that stuff.--HamedogTalk|@ 05:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
As a passing reader - if nobody changes it then you may as well remove it because I cannot read it. Garrie 04:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree the thing is impossible to read Outside Center 03:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Which logo? The current one or this one: Image:Tri Nations Rugby Union logo.PNG?--HamedogTalk|@ 06:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't edit for a weekend

edit

And I come back on wiki and see poor, unsourced edits. If you add the scores, add the images and other such what. Where are the references? This was good quality a week ago!--HamedogTalk|@ 09:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Tri Nations.jpg

edit
 

Image:Tri Nations.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Tri Nations Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply