Wikipedia

Talk:2006 United States Senate election in Tennessee

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Initial comments

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Will someone please put up the Rasmussen Report poll from October 25? --KnoxvilleMoose 15:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Done! But I had to link RCP. CJC47 18:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Great, that works for now. The Rasmussen link should be available eventually. · j e r s y k o talk · 18:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Will there really be Tennesee US Senate elections for three cycles in a row? Which class is Frist in? Chadlupkes 02:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you are referring to that box thing at the bottom, that was a mistake that has been fixed. 2002-2006-2008-2012 is the appropriate sequence. Frist is Class 1, by the way. Danthemankhan 03:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Superbowl party

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

We talked about this in March of 2006. How is this a discovery now, in October?--Scribner 04:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The blog cited was the New York Times' politics blog written by a respected reporter. On top of that, the blog post referenced a newspaper source for the claim cited in our article (i.e. that TN TV stations are now airing a different RNC ad in its place). I initially used the NYT cite instead of the newspaper cite because the latter's URL was unweildy. Nonetheless, I replaced the information and the cite. Everything else in the subsection is now cited to an undoubtedly reliable source; the only part that was cited to the NYT blog was that one sentence. · j e r s y k o talk · 13:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
This: "In another ad, the RNC noted that Ford filmed a campaign ad in a church" and the new ad, "shaky" we may want to include. Two TN TV stations aren't running the new RNC ad. They're awaiting verification of claims that seem false...I suspect we'll have a source for that today. Glad to see you've moved the section over here.--Scribner 14:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I liked your change to the first sentence in the subsection, it's a better lead-in. We'll see if media attention continues to focus on the ads. The first RNC ad seems to have gotten (limited) attention only because of the "bimbo" ad (by the way, where did you find these ad names?), so I'm ok with not mentioning it here for now. And you're probably right about the "shaky" ad, it seems destined to follow the path of the "bimbo" ad, though we should wait for sources to see if it gets national attention, of course. · j e r s y k o talk · 14:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
The ad "code names" were on MSNBC. I know that you know that Corker could have had the ad pulled. Tony Snow is quoted as saying as much. It's speculative. This will all come out in the debate.--Scribner 14:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Juicy, I'm looking forward to it. · j e r s y k o talk · 15:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Here's the "shaky" source and proof the "bimbo" ad was still running last night: [1]--Scribner 15:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Am I the only one that sees that predominant is a bit unclear? I think that saying that these papers are the major newspapers for their respective cities would not only be more clear, but more accurate. Stealthound 17:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I notice that on the external link section, only links to endorsements by Ford are listed. Is that intentional or are there simply no newspapers that suppot Corker?71.0.166.90 02:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Check the article text--there's a subsection titled "endorsements" that includes prominent endorsements for both candidates. I'm not sure why Ford's are reproduced in the external links section, since they're already in the article text. I'll remove them. · j e r s y k o talk · 03:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Polls and full disclosure

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should there be some notation of polls with ties to parties such as Hamilton-Beattie and Benenson Strat? For instance, Real Clear Politics puts a little (R) or (D) after them on their site. CJC47 19:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Probably not a bad idea; I thought Beneson looked like an outlier. Also, note: No matter what the stated day is on it, the last Rasmussen poll could not have come out on November 2, as it is currently November 1 and I can link to it.

Chattanooga paper endorsements

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added a paragraph about the Chattanooga paper endorsements since the newspaper maintains two separate editorial pages and staff, and just adding the endorsement to both paragraphs without explanation could be confusing. I removed the paper reference and external link to Ford's blog from Ford's paragraph, and added links directly to the paper's archives. Here's another link with a list of all the endorsements and the way the newspaper defines its two pages in its titles: http://www.timesfreepress.com/absolutenm/templates/election2006data.aspx?articleid=1018&zoneid=69 Flowanda 18:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ford Family Political Dynasty

edit

How come there is no discussion here of the Ford Families Political Scandals and the effect the ongoing (during the elections)investigations and convictions his uncles for political corruption, the disputed election of his aunt, and a history of Ford Family Power in Memphis TN and a mistrust of the Family in the rest of Tennessee? How come no one from Tennessee points this out?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Tennessee_Waltz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ford_(politician) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Ford_Sr http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophelia_Ford http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/03/10/family_ties_could_bind_a_political_advancement/ http://www.metropulse.com/dir_zine/dir_2004/1423/t_cover.html http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2006/senate/tn_ford.html

It is very telling that no one in the national media ever really understood the Ford family position in TN Politics. Very powerful in Memphis, viewed with mistrust every where else in Tennessee. The real story is not that he lost, the real story is that he very nearly won, and I don't think the TV ad had as much influence on the election as the Ford family history did.

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States Senate election in Tennessee, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on United States Senate election in Tennessee, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States Senate election in Tennessee, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2006_United_States_Senate_election_in_Tennessee&oldid=1231996290"