Talk:2006 Winter Olympics closing ceremony

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copy from IOC article

edit

The first versions of this article seemed to be an almost direct copy from the IOC news story: here, edited slightly which only made it more unintelligible. Besides being a copywrite violation, this was blatantly non-POV. I think it makes more sense to curtail information until after the event actually happens than to copy POV information from the official brochure. I've edited what I can and will also add the appropriate live event disclaimer. Crunch 14:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Security Breaches

edit

Seems we had another GoldenPalace.com occurence.Hektor 21:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I was unaware of the existence of this article, and started a discussion here. Regards, Redux 23:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
There was also a female streaker [1], complete with blonde hair, high heels and black stockings, but she did not made it to television. The guy was for GoldenPalace.com, but the girl was politically motivated against Silvio Berlusconi.Hektor 23:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
You mean that this website actually paid that guy to pull that stunt?? That's outragious. Do we have confirmation on that, or is it an assumption at this point? Redux 23:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
I got that on German TV. There is a previous example in curling [2]. GoldenPalace.com seems to do that quite often.Hektor 23:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Here is a source "...The man, dressed in a black T-shirt with the name of an internet gambling site printed on the front,..."
Edited the "Intruder" section to include this, and found the MSNBC article on it here. Peter Gawtry 03:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
The whole point of the stunt was to get free publicity. I suggest we do as the MSNBC article does and only indicate that it was done by a online line gambling site so as to deny them any via Wikipedia. Caerwine Caerwhine 03:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • I respectfully beg to differ. It already said it was GoldenPalace on the GoldenPalace page in Wikipedia. No harm to do so here. This IS an encyclopedia, afterall. Arbiteroftruth 04:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
    • I have no problem with it being on the page about Golden Palace or on these less looked at talk pages, but rewarding disruption with the publicity sought only encourages more of it. The responsible thing is to deny as far as practical the publicity they seek. Caerwine Caerwhine 04:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
      • Let's reach a compromise. We will place a link to the GoldenPalace page, but mask it with the words "an online casino". What do you say?Arbiteroftruth 05:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
        • A reasonable compromise, since it doesn't reward them with in article text but does provide a way for those interested in more detail to access it. I made a small change in the text used to anchor the link so that it is clearer that it is a link to the specific idiots that were irresponsible for the disruption and not online casinos in general. Caerwine Caerwhine 05:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ceremony or Ceremonies?

edit

The title of this article is 2006 Winter Olympics Closing Ceremony but throughout it is referred to as the ceremonies. We should probably be consistent. Either change the title to plural, with a rederict, rewrite the article to reference the event as singular. Crunch 13:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

The media and the website use the plural form. Even though I don't know the reason for the use of plural though, I support following the official norm with ceremonies. --Kvasir 14:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
I would agree, but shouldn't we move the article to 2006 Winter Olympics Closing Ceremonies then? Regards, Redux 20:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Shall I go ahead with the move, then? Redux 13:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

David Emerson

edit

Any sign of him in these Olympics? Was he suppose to be at the Games representing the Canadian federal government? The mayor was there, the premier was there, and even the GG and her family, where's the federal government? David Emerson was created Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics afterall. Did he get recalled already? --Kvasir 00:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

There was no sign of Emerson. The GG and her family and Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay represented the federal government. [3] [4] -- SNIyer12 02:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Avril Lavigne

edit

Avril Lavigne's performance was actually part of the Vancouver segment of the ceremonies. However, it also fits with the musical finale portion too. I've added the Avril mention to the Vancouver segment as well; I'm going to let you guys decide which section it should go under (right now there are two Avril mentions in the article), since I'm not that experienced with Olympic articles and don't know too much about any "structural rules" of such articles. --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 07:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I support organising it chronologically. Which means only mention Lavigne in the Vancouver 2010 section. --Kvasir 08:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Music

edit

Hi, I just wanted to know if anyone knew what the music used in the closing ceremonies was and if that could be added to the article. I did read elsewhere (http://courier-journal.gns.gannettonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060226/OLYMPICS/602260301/1024) that a tribute to Niccolo Paganini's music was used in the finale as well.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2006 Winter Olympics closing ceremony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply