Talk:2007 New York City steam explosion

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Photos

edit

There were 6 similar long-distance shots of the steam cloud from Flickr, of which I chose and uploaded 3. Which one do you think is best?

The original 6 on Flickr are: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 12:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

There's a bunch of photos under CC-BY-SA-2.0 here: [7]. I've uploaded one at Image:NYC steam explosion 2007 people debris.jpg and will add it to the article. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 12:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Move to New York steam pipe explosion?

edit

The Steam didn't explode, the pipe did. AceKingQueenJack 18:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • That is unnecessary qualification. The explosion was caused by the steam escaping suddenly from the pipe. The pipe did not explode either. Technically it was not an explosion, because the blast wave was not supersonic. But explosion was the term used by RS, so that is how it is known now. There was a similar issue with TWA 800. Dhaluza 22:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Suggested Background

edit

Hi - I'm a relatively new Wiki user, and don't know the procedures for editing a page. I thought I'd pass on a link about the Con Ed Steam System regulatory overview. The Consolidated Edison Company of New York (http://www.coned.com) owns the Steam Business Unit (http://www.coned.com/steam/). (Or maybe they're technically called "Con Edison steam operations", I'm not sure.) The NY Public Service Commission (http://www.dps.state.ny.us/) regulates rates and revenues of the Steam Busniess Unit in the same general way that it regulates New York State's electric, gas and other utilities.

The most recent rate plan was adopted by the Commission and became effective September 22, 2006, in Case 05-S-1376 (Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. for Steam Service.) That Order is available at http://www3.dps.state.ny.us/pscweb/WebFileRoom.nsf/Web/55664328E5E50A53852571EE0054B5ED/$File/301A_05S1376.pdf?OpenElement

Also note: In a press release, "Con Edison is urging all customers in the East Midtown area of Manhattan to discontinue their use of non-essential electrical appliances and equipment until problems on electrical cables can be resolved following yesterday’s steam-main rupture." See http://www.coned.com/messages/pr20070719_2.asp

Last, a decent overview of the Steam system is at http://www.coned.com/steam/pdf/Steam_ops_overview.pdf

Energy4U 13:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone know what pressure this steam pipe was at? And was ConEd able to isolate the line after the explosion? Are there any automatic safety systems to isolate the line on low pressure signals? It seems like this is not the case given the long duration of steam release, unless the steam is at an exceptionally high pressure.

Rukky 15:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Since this info has broader implications than just this incident, I think this should go into a new article, perhaps Manhattan steam network or ConEd steam network or ConEd steam operations. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Nevermind, I see someone started New York steam system. I'll make these links redirects to that. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

This part of the explanation under 'Cause' seems to be incorrect:

"Water hammer is a phenomenon that occurs when cold water enters a steam pipe, causing the steam inside to condense into liquid water, increasing the pressure, and thus causing the pipe to burst..."

Converting water to steam increases the pressure. Steam condensing back to water should REDUCE the pressure. PV=nRT and all that.

Water hammer is when a mass of moving water is suddenly stopped (typically by a closing valve) and the pressure spikes. I'm not sure if compressible steam is capable of hammering the same way that incompressible water can hammer.

165.154.46.175 02:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re Water Hammer: good point, that does look incorrect. I had understood that the mass of water causes more condensation (becasue it's already colder than steam), gets pushed along by steam pressure that builds up behind it, picks up velocity, then crashes into a valve or bend in the pipe with enough force to cause a sudden rupture. The steam mains are supposed to carry (I think I recall) 125 pounds of pressure or so, which is quite a lot but I wouldn't say "exceptional". I believe the steam keeps flowing until it's manually shut off, so from a pipe of the diameter that ruptured there's plenty of volume coming down the pipe to expand in a cloud above the street. Energy4U

Death by heart attack

edit

Trying not to sound callous; should the death be attributed to the explosion? It was a heart attack, possibly brought about by poor health and panic. Isn't it speculation to attribute it directly to the incident? --Monotonehell 05:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, all other news sources do, including the New York Times. -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 23:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Since I placed the above question the article has been edited and now doesn't outright attribute her death directly to the accident. The previous version was what I had a problem with. The current version is okay. --Monotonehell 13:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

What Happened to the Cop?

edit

The New York City Fire Department gave the event a five-alarm response, sending more than 200 firefighters from 40 units, three of whom sustained injuries, along with one police officer.

Does that mean one police officer was sent, or one police officer was injured? Whoever wrote that (or knows the answer), please fix it.

Water Hammer

edit

Try looking at the Spirax Sarco Website they describe water hammer correctly.

I agree, but verification should be in order here. Either water hammer or the phenomenon described in the article (water contact/steam condensation) could have caused a rupture, but it would be unusual for both to occur at the same time. I think it was one or the other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.66.101.126 (talk) 21:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Respirators/Frozen Area

edit

"However, anyone entering the containment zone was still required to wear a respirator and protective clothing during the clean-up."

I went into the frozen area without a mask (after going through a police checkpoint). A lot of the police, etc wore masks, but not everyone was required to. I know this is original research, so I'm not editing the page. But, the statement is also not supported by the sources given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.188.199.11 (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


edit

Reference 21, used 4 times, does no longer exist. The disadvantage of using newspaper articles as references. Adacus12 (talk) 00:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is this really a steam explosion?

edit

I was under the impression that a steam explosion is one caused by sudden and rapid boiling of water, and the massive expansion of the water vapor thereafter, sometimes rupturing a vessel, sometimes not. This is simply a burst pipe releasing pressurized steam into the atmosphere with great force. Not sure if that counts as a "Steam explosion", even if that's what the media called it..45Colt 04:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2007 New York City steam explosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply