This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Not at all, as Switzerland in fact is responsible for the defence of Liechtenstein. (Even if they are not entitled to dislocate troops without Liechtenstein permission.) Jakro6422:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I also agree that this is not a very qualified name, which gives the feeling that the military did
actually attack during this invasion. The 2003 invasion of Iraq is the name of the iraq war article. I didn't even hear of this incident until very late. Wwicki07:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
I find this statement to not be of Wikipedia quality. Liechtenstein accepted any apologies and that was that. This statement is not backed up by any sources and therefore there is no evidence whatsoever that this was an embarrassment. If you can find me a source that would be great. Wwicki07:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
“The BBC's Paul Legg says the incident is embarrassing for the Swiss but not as bad as the one in 1985.” [1], second paragrpah from the bottom. – Zntrip16:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I also find "embarassing" to be a little...unappropriate. Why embarassing? Embarassing maybe for the lieutenant who made the navigational error, but only in front of his troops. It's not the first time something like this has happened, and won't be the last. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.2.180.180 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes - this isn't the first time something like this has happened. The reference to 1985 refers to an artillery exercise - strong winds blew a couple of rockets off course, they landed in forests on the wrong side of the border and caused a forest fire - Switzerland had to pay quite a lot of compensation for the damage —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wren-3 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
The self defence Army of a neutral country accidently invades another undefended country and you ask if it is embarassing? Since invasion threatens the very existance of a country it is taken very seriously by most countries. Image if the US or British army crossed an international border by mistake. 82.212.19.8417:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
