Talk:2009 AFC Cup knockout stage
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bracket
editWhy did we need this big long bracket when the draw hasen't been made. So, OK, it can be made t ofit when the draw's made, but Round 16 was never made to compliment the Quarter-Finals stage, if it was the draw would have been made a long long time ago.Druryfire (talk) 14:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- I think you may the delete the bracket before the draw, but please do not replace it with a wrong bracket template.--Antonytse (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- My only thinking is, when people who don't know the tournament come and see it, they may think that the draw was pre-meditated from start to beginning. This isn't really the case. I'm happy to keep the bracket in place, but maybe the draw calender should be added so the article details how it was done? I'm sure after 29 June, things will be more clear and the article will start to take shapeDruryfire (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- However, there is no information about the date of the draw on the AFC offical website.--Antonytse (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- The dates on the 29th June.Druryfire (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, so you can add it on the calender. Last thing I have to say is the bracket template that you have chosen is wrong.--Antonytse (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- The dates on the 29th June.Druryfire (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- However, there is no information about the date of the draw on the AFC offical website.--Antonytse (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- My only thinking is, when people who don't know the tournament come and see it, they may think that the draw was pre-meditated from start to beginning. This isn't really the case. I'm happy to keep the bracket in place, but maybe the draw calender should be added so the article details how it was done? I'm sure after 29 June, things will be more clear and the article will start to take shapeDruryfire (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2009 AFC Cup knockout stage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120610102249/http://images.the-afc.com/Documents/competitions/fixtures/368-2087.pdf to http://images.the-afc.com/Documents/competitions/fixtures/368-2087.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.the-afc.com/en/component/joomleague/?view=report&compID=368&matchId=2498 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.the-afc.com/en/component/joomleague/?view=report&compID=368&matchId=2499 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.the-afc.com/en/component/joomleague/?view=report&compID=368&matchId=2494 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.the-afc.com/en/component/joomleague/?view=report&compID=368&matchId=2492 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.the-afc.com/en/component/joomleague/?view=report&compID=368&matchId=2489
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)