Talk:2009 Bulgarian parliamentary election
Text and/or other creative content from Bulgarian parliamentary elections, 2009 – majoritarian vote was copied or moved into Bulgarian parliamentary election, 2009 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
A news item involving 2009 Bulgarian parliamentary election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 July 2009. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThere's no way this article deserves to be on the front page and elections of larger nations such as Mexico that happened on the same day don't. Sourside21 (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- You're tackling the issue wrong: it's not our fault that the Mexico article is not good enough. Improving the Mexico article would work much better than complaining over here. The population of a country doesn't really have much influence, major nationwide elections appear on the Main Page by default. Todor→Bozhinov 10:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, I wasn't tackling the issue wrong at all. My point originally was that neither article deserved a place on the front page, as they were just legislative elections, so why would the state of Mexico's article matter to me at all? Bulgaria's election does result in a change of executive though, so I think it's fine the way it is. And did I ever say it was anybody's fault? Sourside21 (talk) 23:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Siderov-attack.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Siderov-attack.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:47, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
File:14d3bd.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:14d3bd.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 9 October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bulgarian parliamentary election, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.bnr.bg/RadioBulgaria/Emission_English/News/2804B12.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611192236/http://www.bgnewsnet.com/story.php?lang=en&sid=23909 to http://www.bgnewsnet.com/story.php?lang=en&sid=23909
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090707220209/http://rezultati.cik2009.bg:80/results/proportional/index.html to http://rezultati.cik2009.bg/results/proportional/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225103151/http://rezultati.cik2009.bg/results/proportional/rik_00.html to http://rezultati.cik2009.bg/results/proportional/rik_00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bulgarian parliamentary election, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090708054815/http://rezultati.cik2009.bg:80/activity/rik_00.html to http://rezultati.cik2009.bg/activity/rik_00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)