Talk:2009 Championship League

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Table colors

edit

If the table background colors mean something, this should be explained. They also need to be altered, as they are very garish (I can't find any other tables on WP that look like M&Ms), and they are presently an accessibility problem for red/green colorblind users (in particular, the black on saturated red is illegible in greyscale). The green is, for me, hard (as in near-painful) to read for very long, without color blindness, due to the "neon"-like nature of that green shade. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 11:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

And what colors would acceptable for you? If you say, then i will change all the tables. (Altough i can't see the problem.) Armbrust (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Have changed the colors of the tables. Armbrust (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
What do they mean, though? I'm not trying to be a fly in the ointment, it's just unclear what they're supposed to suggest to the reader. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 05:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on 2009 Championship League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply