Talk:2009 ICC Champions Trophy

Radio coverage?

The "Media coverage" section lists only TV rights holders. What about radio (and for that matter, online and mobile) coverage? Here in England there doesn't seem to be any - the BBC certainly haven't got it, which doesn't please me too much - but is that the case everywhere else as well? Loganberry (Talk) 14:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Following up my own question, there does appear to be a commercial offering of streaming audio commentary on Cricinfo, albeit not available in certain countries, but no traditional radio coverage anywhere in the world (that I've found). Loganberry (Talk) 16:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

There is live radio coverage in UAE through radio channel 106.2 Hum FM. I should list that. Also Willow.tv is showing the matches online, of course, for a fee. Sherenk (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

warm up matches

There should be a section for the warm up matches like in the 2009 ICC World Twenty20 page.--Blackknight12 (talk) 14:17, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't really see the point of having warm-up match details or scorecards on this page. They don't really contribute anything, take up far too much space and have too many red links. At the very least, create a "hide" box around them so that they can be hidden from view or make a separate article. Sherenk (talk) 05:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

They should have a seperate articles. Aaroncrick (talk) 07:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

West Indies not eliminated

Un-red-highlighting West Indies since they can still theoretically proceed, if India and Pakistan both beat Australia, then West Indies totally thrashes India. Pirsq (talk) 16:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Only England is confirmed in qualifying for the semis. Sherenk (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Someone added "West Indies eliminated as a result" after the second match. I've moved that two matches lower, as West Indies were theoretically still in the running until the end of the Australia-India match. Pirsq (talk) 03:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Tied on points

South Africa needed 313 or so to get ahead of Sri Lanka to retain hope of qualifying for the next round. Anyone know a source for the rules related to run rate (or whatever it is) used to separate sides? Tsinfandel (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Some information is given over here Cricinfo Sherenk (talk) 03:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

England not B1 yet

England shouldn't be down as B1 yet for the semis. NZ could win and get better nrr. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.190.54 (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Bowling economy rate

Since when was economy rate more important than bowling average? This ain't T20. Then why is economy being listed ahead of average in the bowling leaders table?

Question

Why do my edits keep getting removed? I don't see why using initials is better than full names, can somebody explain? 79.71.133.11 (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)