Talk:2009 in archaeology
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 in archaeology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
60 million year old fossils are not studied by archaeologists
editI removed the following text:
- In 2009, the fossils of 28 individual T. cerrejonensis (Titanoboas) were announced to have been found in the coal mines of Cerrejón, La Guajira, Colombia.[1][2]
Archaeologists deal with humans, their remains, their material culture, and their natural environment. Archaeologists do not deal with fossils that precede this. Dinosaurs etc. are excavated and studied by paleontologists. Stefan Kruithof (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
References
- ^ Kwok, Roberta (4 February 2009). "Scientists find world's biggest snake". Nature. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - ^ Head, Jason J. "Giant boid snake from the paleocene neotropics reveals hotter past equatorial temperatures". Nature. 457: 715–718. Retrieved 2009-02-05.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)
King Tut statue discovery
editKing Tut’s statue found, by Zee Entertainment Enterprises
A small statue of Tutanchamon found in Northern Iraq seems relevant enough for inclusion (it will probably become a prime museum piece). However, the team that discovered it seems ideologically driven (trying to underscore the links between ancient Egypt and Mitanni, thereby strengthening the Kurdish claim of a nation of their own in that region). Also, I'm not sure how reliable this news report is. I'll leave the discovery on this talk page for now, and if other news agencies start reporting on it (and hopefully shed light on the importance of the discovery) it may be included in the main article. Stefan Kruithof (talk) 14:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2009 in archaeology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120223080309/http://www.lastampa.it/_web/cmstp/tmplrubriche/arte/grubrica.asp?ID_blog=62&ID_articolo=1164&ID_sezione=117&sezione=News to http://www.lastampa.it/_web/cmstp/tmplrubriche/arte/grubrica.asp?ID_blog=62&ID_articolo=1164&ID_sezione=117&sezione=News
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306021611/http://finds.org.uk/blogs/centralunit/2009/09/07/recent-discovery-of-a-roman-coin-hoard-in-the-shrewsbury-area/ to http://finds.org.uk/blogs/centralunit/2009/09/07/recent-discovery-of-a-roman-coin-hoard-in-the-shrewsbury-area/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)