Talk:2010–2014 Portuguese financial crisis
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Material from 2010–14 Portuguese financial crisis was split to Economic Adjustment Programme for Portugal on 2015-01-06. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:2010–14 Portuguese financial crisis. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 15 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Annadubon, Tegan190.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Changes
editI have changed some of the POV in this article, citing an article from DN, which when read does not talk about State bankrupcy (which never happened) or bank problems (which did not affect the 4 main banks)Pedro cid (talk) 18:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
This article meets none of wikipedia standards.
It is extremely politicized, polluted with an array of subjective irrelevant judgement and conclusions from the very own editor of the article.
Unsubstantiated op-ed article which needs a complete overhaul to remove the editors opinions, conclusions and unrelated politicized statements or removal
- I agree. This article is partial and must be corrected. If the author doesn't do it in a week, I will. Nevertheless, the valuable information is to be kept. Orwell Mill (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2012–2013 Cypriot financial crisis which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:30, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010–14 Portuguese financial crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100219060101/http://www.businessweek.com:80/news/2010-02-15/merkel-economy-adviser-says-greece-bailout-should-bring-penalty.html to http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-15/merkel-economy-adviser-says-greece-bailout-should-bring-penalty.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 2010–14 Portuguese financial crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140816131039/http://www.dn.pt/inicio/portugal/interior.aspx?content_id=1756013 to http://www.dn.pt/inicio/portugal/interior.aspx?content_id=1756013
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-15/merkel-economy-adviser-says-greece-bailout-should-bring-penalty.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005235156/http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite2_1_03/10/2012_464362 to http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite2_1_03/10/2012_464362
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Insertion of personal views
editHi @Aarfrunzindin,
Can you please refrain from attempting to re-add comments about bureaucracy and the numbers of public employees to this article. The changes you're attempting to make appear in the first instance unsupported (that bureaucracy caused the economic crisis) and in the latter case irrelevant (the number of public employees at the time or years after the government announcement). Combined these comments look more to be attempting to justify the inclusion of your own personal views on the matter into the article rather than it being of relevant historical substance that is well-supported. Apache287 (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)