Talk:2010 Bivalvia taxonomy
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 65.94.170.207 in topic A note
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A note
editI moved the title of the article from "2010 proposed taxonomy of the Bivalvia" to "Taxonomy of the Bivalvia (Bouchet, Rocroi, Bieler, Carter & Coan, 2010)" as that is the standard form we have used and plus, this taxonomy is no longer "proposed" -- it has been accepted. Invertzoo (talk) 13:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- However, this article is not about the new taxonomy publication, it is the taxonomy presented within the publication. The title of the article "Taxonomy of the Bivalvia (Bouchet, Rocroi, Bieler, Carter & Coan, 2010)" supposes this is an article about the literature, and not an article about the taxonomy presented within the article. Since this is about the new taxonomy presented, it is better to be renamed as the 2010 taxonomy. Hence 2010 Bivalvia taxonomy, which is also more WP:CONCISE -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 11:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)